Way more than just video interviews.
Our interview intelligence guides you through the entire interview process, so you find your next great teammate—effectively and equitably.
“Having the ability to record and share interview clips with our hiring teams has been a game-changer in getting good candidates into the process and speeding up our time to hire.”
“Pillar is a huge opportunity for us to be completely confident about the fairness and effectiveness of our assessments. It is an invaluable tool for coaching, developing and supporting our newer interviewers on the team.”
Unconscious bias refers to the automatic stereotypes or judgments we make about people based on their race, gender, age, social class, and other factors without being aware of it. These biases can influence our thoughts and actions in various scenarios and contexts, including in the workplace. Unconscious bias in recruitment can have a drastic influence on the hiring process—and not always for the better.
Bias in recruitment and selection is hardly a new phenomenon, but it has gained significant attention in recent years due to its impact on organizational diversity and fairness. Hiring the right talent is crucial for the success of an organization, but when unconscious biases come into play, it can lead to missed opportunities for both employers and potential candidates.
Organizations are also paying increased attention to selection bias. This occurs when the individuals chosen for a group (in this case, potential job candidates) are not representative of the larger population. Such discrepancies may be due to a variety of factors, such as recruitment methods that unintentionally favor certain groups of people.
Hiring biases manifest in various ways throughout the recruitment process:
- Resume Screening: Names, educational background, or addresses on resumes can trigger biases. A candidate with a name that sounds ethnic or foreign might be unconsciously perceived as less qualified or competent than others.
- Interviews: Physical appearance and mannerisms can all affect a recruiter's perception of a candidate's suitability for a role. Thankfully, interview intelligence– a nuanced understanding and awareness of these potential biases during the interview process–can help reduce these biases. Recruiters and hiring managers need to constantly evaluate whether their perceptions are based on the candidate's actual skills and experiences or on unconscious prejudices.
- Skills Assessment: Even when assessing skills, biases can creep in. A candidate from a lesser-known institution might be perceived as less competent than one from a prestigious institution, even if their actual skills are on par or superior.
Combating unconscious bias in recruitment requires proactive measures. Organizations should invest in training programs for their hiring teams to recognize and mitigate these biases. Techniques such as blinded resume reviews, where identifying information is removed, can also help in reducing biases during the initial screening process.
Despite best intentions, unconscious biases can seep into the recruitment process, unintentionally influencing decisions and outcomes. Understanding the different types of bias in recruitment is key to ensuring that the talent acquisition process is fair, equitable, and efficient.
- Affinity Bias: Affinity bias describes the tendency to gravitate towards individuals who are similar to us in terms of background, interests, or personal characteristics.
- Confirmation Bias: This type of bias occurs when one looks for information that confirms pre-existing beliefs while ignoring data that contradicts them.
- Halo Effect: This occurs when a positive trait overshadows other characteristics. For instance, if a candidate has an impressive degree or has worked for a renowned company, the recruiter might unconsciously assume they excel in other areas too.
- Horns Effect: Opposite to the halo effect, the horns effect is when one negative trait affects our perception of a candidate's other qualities.
- Age Bias: This is a common bias where assumptions are made about a candidate based on their age.
Bias in the hiring process is further evidenced by bias in hiring statistics. Disparities in hiring rates among race, age, and other demographics often highlight the pervasive nature of unconscious biases in the recruitment arena.
It should be noted, too, that while unconscious biases may be involuntary, explicit bias is the deliberate and conscious form of bias. Although many modern workplaces have strict policies against explicit biases, they can still rear their ugly heads in recruitment if not vigilantly monitored.
Learning how to avoid bias in interviews is crucial to finding the right candidates for the right role. Studying hiring bias examples is a good way to recognize and understand these biases and, most importantly, determine how to mitigate them.
One classic unconscious bias example in interviews is the probing of personal or family commitments, especially when directed at female candidates. Questions like "Do you have children?" or "Are you planning to start a family soon?" might seem innocent on the surface, but they’re rooted in deeply entrenched stereotypes about gender roles and responsibilities.
Other unconscious bias interview examples revolve around candidates’ racial or ethnic backgrounds. Interviewers often demonstrate bias through questions like, "Where are you really from?" or "Your accent is interesting; where did you pick it up?" Such examples of bias sentences may be perceived as microaggressions. Even when driven by innocent curiosity, they can alienate candidates and make them feel like outsiders.
Age is another area where unconscious biases can creep into the interview process. For example, asking older candidates questions like, "Aren't you overqualified for this role?" or "How do you feel about working with younger managers?" suggests that their age might be a deterrent for the job at hand.
With remote work on the rise, some companies are also exhibiting bias towards candidates that have worked primarily or exclusively in online roles. An interviewer might question a candidate with a history of remote work or freelancing with a hint of skepticism, asking, "Don't you prefer stable, office-based jobs?" or "How do you manage distractions at home?”
Bias manifests in terms of physical appearance as well. A candidate with tattoos might be asked, "Do you think clients will find your tattoos professional?" This not only reflects a certain stereotype about people with tattoos, but calls into question the candidate's judgment and understanding of professionalism based solely on their appearance.
Bias in hiring statistics are clear: the repercussions of not addressing biases in the workplace are extensive. There are various techniques that businesses can employ to combat bias, including blind recruitment. It entails removing all personal identifiers from resumes and applications, thereby helping to reduce bias in resume screening.
But biases can persist far beyond the initial resume screening stage. To fully address unconscious bias in hiring, organizations should establish a comprehensive interviewing and onboarding process. Having a fixed set of questions for all candidates ensures consistency and reduces the likelihood of making judgments based on irrelevant or personal information.
Avoiding unconscious bias in interviewing also means being acutely aware of potential pitfalls.
Interviewer training is invaluable in this regard. By regularly training hiring managers and interviewers about the various forms of unconscious biases, how they manifest, and the impact they have, organizations can foster a more informed and aware recruitment team.
Feedback loops can also be instrumental. Encourage interviewers to discuss their decisions with others, especially if multiple interviewers are involved. Different perspectives can highlight potential biases in judgment and ensure that hiring decisions are well-rounded and based on multiple viewpoints.
Technology can be another effective tool for minimizing biases. AI-driven software designed to screen resumes can be programmed to disregard factors like age, gender, or ethnicity, focusing only on the qualifications and experiences relevant to the job. While technology is not infallible and has its own set of challenges, it can be a valuable ally in the fight against biases.
Diversity targets, while sometimes seen as controversial, also factor into the conversation around how to reduce bias in the hiring process. These targets aren’t just about filling quotas—rather, they’re made to ensure that the hiring process gives everyone a fair chance.
Addressing unconscious bias in the workplace is a strategic necessity for organizations looking to attract the best talent. The first step in confronting the issue is acknowledging its existence and recognizing its potential to influence decisions. Offering unconscious bias training to employees can be instrumental in identifying and mitigating these biases.
A well-structured training program involves several key components:
- Awareness and Identification: The initial phase involves making participants aware of the very existence of biases. Present evidence to showcase how biases can impact decisions. Participants might be surprised to learn that biases, though unintentional, can skew judgment and lead to unfair hiring practices.
- Reflection and Self-Assessment: Encourage participants to reflect on their own biases. Various tools, like the Implicit Association Test (IAT), can help individuals uncover biases they weren't even aware they had. This introspection can be a powerful motivator for change.
- Scenario Analysis: Utilize real-world scenarios to highlight how biases manifest in the hiring process. For instance, present participants with two identical resumes with different names (one "traditional" and another ethnically distinct) and discuss any differences in perception or assessment.
- Continuous Learning: Encourage ongoing learning by providing resources, literature, and courses on the subject. Unconscious bias training online platforms can be especially beneficial, as they allow participants to learn at their own pace. Online platforms can also leverage interactive modules and simulations for a more comprehensive learning experience.
- Feedback Mechanisms: After the training, institute feedback mechanisms where employees can discuss their experiences in addressing biases. Peer discussions can often lead to insightful revelations and shared strategies for tackling biases.
- Measure and Monitor: Regularly assess the impact of the training. This could involve tracking diversity metrics in hiring, collecting feedback from new hires about their interview experience, or conducting periodic surveys to gauge employee perceptions.
Pillar helps teams hire more strategically, leading to a 40% increase in diverse hires. With Pillar, businesses can hire based on real data and remove bias from the interviewing process by boosting transparency and training interviewers on best practices.